Liam Draxl vs Rei Sakamoto Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 06 Jul at 06:55 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
L. Draxl vs R. Sakamoto

CAN
1
Win
Played
1
Win

JPN
1
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Draxl 1 - 1 Sakamoto
They have played 4 sets in total, with Liam Draxl winning 2 and Rei Sakamoto winning 2. The last match between Rei Sakamoto and Liam Draxl was at the Cary Challenger, 06-07-2025, Round: F, Surface: Hard, with Rei Sakamoto getting the victory 6-1 6-4.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Draxl | 1 |
Sakamoto | 1 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(F) Cary Challenger(07-06-25)
(R1) Lugano Challenger(02-25-25)
L. Draxl vs R. Sakamoto H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$31,240 | Career Prize Money | $113,620 |
64.72% (211-115) | Career Total W/L | 51.30% (59-56) |
0 | Hard | 1 |
1 | Indoor | 0 |
9 | Titles | 2 |
1 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
50.00% (1-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 0.00% (0-3) |
L. Draxl vs R. Sakamoto Match Preview:
- Sakamoto has a slight advantage in second serve points, winning 45.13%, compared to Draxl's 42.82%. Could this be a decisive factor in the match?
- In return games, Draxl shows strength, winning 50.14% of opponents' second serves, while Sakamoto secures 44.13%.
- When facing first serves, Draxl again outperforms Sakamoto with a 26.62% success rate over Sakamoto's 24.2%.
- Under pressure, Sakamoto excels by saving 55% of breakpoints, as opposed to Draxl's 50.24%.
- Draxl boasts a higher overall win percentage in the past year, with a 70.53% win rate compared to Sakamoto's 58.49%.
- On their best surfaces, Draxl thrives on indoor hard courts with a 69% win rate, whereas Sakamoto performs best on hard courts with a 56% win rate.
- Both players have similar playing levels over the last year, competing primarily in Challengers/ITF tournaments above $10K, but Draxl has a slightly better win record.
- Draxl has a clear edge in direct head-to-head matchups, winning their only previous encounter against Sakamoto in straight sets.
- The quality of opponents faced slightly favors Sakamoto, as they have competed against stronger-ranked players on average.
- In matches going to a deciding set, Draxl has a narrow advantage, with a 70% win rate compared to Sakamoto's 69%.
- Current form indicates Draxl is more effective at converting breakpoints, with a conversion rate of 31.89% against Sakamoto's 25.47%.
Editorial Prediction (July 6, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match between Sakamoto and Draxl promises to be competitive, with both players demonstrating specific strengths. Sakamoto’s advantage lies in their ability to save breakpoints and their consistent performance on hard courts.
Draxl, on the other hand, showcases remarkable return game statistics and a higher breakpoint conversion rate. Additionally, Draxl's stronger performance in their direct head-to-head matchup gives them an edge in confidence and psychological advantage.
Considering these comparisons, Draxl appears to have a slight edge due to their return game proficiency and past head-to-head victory against Sakamoto. Therefore, Draxl is favored to emerge victorious in this upcoming encounter.
Liam Draxl vs Rei Sakamoto Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
L. Draxl vs R. Sakamoto H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
2 | Sets Won | 2 |
17 | Games Won | 20 |
5 | Aces (Total) | 18 |
6 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
1:34:41 | Average Match Time | 1:34:41 |
61% (74/121) | 1st Serve % | 58% (73/126) |
72% (53/74) | 1st Serve Win % | 79% (58/73) |
45% (21/47) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (22/53) |
30% (3/10) | Break Pts Won % | 25% (4/16) |
37% (46/126) | Return Points Win % | 39% (47/121) |
50% (1/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 50% (1/2) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
L. Draxl Recent Matches Played
R. Sakamoto Recent Matches Played

L. Draxl vs R. Sakamoto Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
64.72% (211/115) | YTD Win/Loss | 51.30% (59/56) |
62.62% (459/274) | Sets Win/Loss | 50.00% (133/133) |
55.21% (3782/3068) | Games Win/Loss | 48.88% (1239/1296) |
65.06% (108/58) | Hard Win/Loss | 54.05% (40/34) |
61.18% (52/33) | Clay Win/Loss | 50.00% (14/14) |
68.92% (51/23) | Indoor Hard W/L | 38.46% (5/8) |
0.00% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
0.33 | Aces Per Game | 0.5 |
1097 | Aces Total | 614 |
0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
932 | Total Double Faults | 275 |
1:41:8 | Average Match Time | 1:45:7 |
415.48 | Average Opponent Rank | 371.43 |
65% (13351/20416) | 1st Serve % | 61% (4934/8033) |
70% (9290/13351) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (3405/4934) |
50% (3523/7065) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (1588/3099) |
47% (1044/2225) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (253/670) |
42% (8672/20570) | Return Points Win % | 37% (2910/7882) |
0.00% (0/3) | Slam W/L | 33.33% (1/2) |
20.00% (2/8) | Masters W/L | 57.14% (4/3) |
100.00% (1/0) | Cups W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
16.67% (1/5) | Main Tour W/L | 20.00% (1/4) |
61.70% (87/54) | Challenger W/L | 57.14% (32/24) |
72.73% (120/45) | Futures W/L | 48.84% (21/22) |
65% (205/314) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (58/113) |
100% (3/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
58% (49/84) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 59% (23/39) |
56% (49/88) | Deciding Set Win % | 58% (21/36) |
90% (212/190) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (55/45) |
9% (212/20) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (55/10) |
19% (113/21) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (60/14) |